This composite was posted to the proboards by user speakelofengrish (SOE). He was Michelle McNamara’s researcher and continued working on her book until it was completed. This composite was included among LE files loaned to Michelle and SOE.
The context section is my summary of information provided by posts from SOE and Winters.
Context: This sighting of a suspicious man occurred one month after EAR’s failed Danville attack on July 5, 1979.
On August 8, 1979, a teenage girl was home alone. Checking on some noise at the home’s rear sliding glass door, she saw a man who was holding a knife, attempting to get in through the sliding door. She turned on a patio light, and he backed away, running to and climbing over a fence that bordered a Christmas tree farm.
From SOE’s post: “The subject was described as a white male adult, 30 to 35 years old, 5’9” with a slender build (and heavy legs), clean-shaven with a very light complexion, and straight, light brown hair that was collar-length. He was wearing a black zippered nylon jacket and faded blue Levis.
The girl was later placed under hypnosis and aided sketch artist Tom Macris in crafting the above composite of the subject.”
Also noted by Winters is the fact that the police responded quickly and thoroughly, with a strong and noticeable police presence (a helicopter and bloodhounds were involved). As Winters observes, “Even though the suspect wasn’t located, such an impressive show of force by the police department probably chased him out of that immediate area for good.”
- The Christmas tree farm into which the subject fled was the *same* Christmas tree farm the EAR used before and after attack #40. That victim’s home was on the other side of the farm (which is essentially just a narrow greenbelt). Additional, a TRAP surveillance unit had observed activity in the same Christmas tree farm on the night of Jan 26, 1979 (and two separate prowler incidents occurred in the area over the course of that night).
- The would-be victim’s description of the individual is consistent with most descriptions of the EAR.
- The composite closely resembles — eerily so, in fact — the subject chosen by victim #15 (the only victim with whom the EAR wore an open-faced mask, revealing his features), from the array of yearbooks detectives asked her to browse, as closely resembling her attacker.
On 7/5/79 in Danville, EAR stood in a couple’s bedroom. As EAR was putting on his mask, the husband woke up and confronted the intruder by screaming obscenities. In perhaps the best demonstration of EAR’s toughness when a male victim is unbound, the EAR did nothing as the wife and husband bolted out a rear sliding glass door.
These sketches have been associated with that incident.
Context: EAR’s previous attack (6/25/79) was in Walnut Creek. Before that, an attack in Danville (6/11/79). This aborted July 5th attack would be followed by another unsuccessful attack on 10/1/79.
Validity: Some have questioned whether this was an EAR attack or whether it even happened at all. However, the dominant view is that it was an EAR incident.
The East Area Rapist’s first known attack happened 40 years ago today: June 18, 1976.
This is most likely the final entry of the canonical composites. I may add some new material on other pages and update existing material, so this blog won’t fall completely silent. At this point, I believe I have catalogued the most common composites that have circulated. (I’ve seen a few that I have no plans on adding without more information–they are rare and little is known about them).
How fitting, then, to end the canonical composites with EAR wearing a mask. May it soon be torn away to reveal the vile man responsible. As we all know, the FBI has called on the public’s help to catch him. The story is international, and visitor numbers to this blog spiked after the FBI’s announcement. I hope that one day an update to this page can be made with his real face. Until that day–and on that day–my thoughts will be with the victims and their families.
This composite was released at the June 2016 press conference, offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of EAR.
Validity: These composites represent the informed opinion of the multiple law enforcement agencies involved. Consequently, they gain some weight when it comes to validity.
On 2/2/78, Brian and Kate Maggiore went for an evening walk with their dog in Rancho Cordovoa. They were shot to death in a backyard on La Alegria Drive.
That’s about as much as anyone can say about this tragedy without stepping into unclear and controversial territory. Was EAR seen prowling–and perhaps personally recognized–by the Maggiore couple? Did the murders involve a possible stalker of Katie’s? Or were they connected to Mather Air Force Base? Or some other circumstances entirely?
A 2/16/78 Sacramento Bee article published these composites of suspects:
Here is a clearer view of the composites (from EAR-ONS timeline):
On 4/16/78, two months later, the Bee published a revised composite of one suspect from a “better description” from a new witness:
A clearer view of the revised composite (from EAR-ONS timeline):
Context: The 2/2/78 Maggiore murders occurred after Victims #29 and #30 (1/28/78) near American River College, and before Victim #31 (3/18/78) in Stockton.
If EAR was prowling in Rancho Cordova that night, it was familiar stalking ground, having struck multiple times in that area. His first known attack occurred down the street.
Validity: The validity of the composites as EAR rests upon two obvious foundations: first, eyewitness reports and memory; second, whether this was an encounter with EAR. I am not going to take a side or represent every detail of the arguments. What follows, instead, are the brief versions.
EAR: Rancho Cordova was familiar stalking ground, and he may have been stalking in it that night: “EAR-style burglaries and prowls in the hours preceding the Maggiore murders suggest he was in attack mode that night.” Additionally, near the crime scene a shoelace was found–or shoelaces, depending on the source. The current LE position seems to be that it is “a single pre-tied shoelace…consistent with the EAR’s knots.” Of course, if it were EAR’s stalking ground, he could have dropped this shoelace at some other time. And if two suspicious men were connected to the crime, that would suggest that EAR was working with a partner, which seems unlikely. (I am trusting that readers will spin out the many obvious variations and rebuttals to these scenarios, as many others have).
Mather AFB Connections: Lt. Ray Biondi investigated the case, with Brian’s air force connections as a primary focus: “It was very close to Mather Air Force Base; and because one of the victims was a military sergeant, I bet you we interviewed thousands of airmen….We had a lot of suspects, a lot of great theories and a lot of guys who seemed to have an established motive, but we never solved that case.” During the initial investigation, it seems, EAR was not a suspect. And newspapers from the time did not mention the shoelace or EAR as a potential culprit, either.
On the AETV forum, Archangel posted a detailed timeline and argument for two suspects working together, with motives involving illegal activities at the air force base. Those archived posts can be found on the earonsgsk board.
A Stalker: As noted in HAP, Katie received threatening calls from a man saying that he was going to rape Katie:
“Katie had been the victim of crank phone calls, and may have been the target of a stalker. The crank phone caller told her he was the one who raped two women in a Regal gas station, and she would be next. Any more information about this possible stalking, or what may have occurred while in Fresno, has not been made public” (Shelby).
According to reliable forum posts, a possible connection to those calls calls was a man sitting in a car outside of Katie’s work, staring at her for an unusual amount of time. If Brian and Katie’s nighttime walks were a routine, a stalker would know such a thing and might even follow them, leading to a confrontation. It should be noted that this scenario is less popular than the EAR or air force scenarios.
Current LE thinking seems to focus on EAR as the assailant, and EAR is noted as a possible suspect by the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, who have reopened their investigation into the murders.
Nicknames: The Mustache; The Bland Man; Revised Composite
Update: The June 2016 FBI announcement presented “Revised Composite” along with two others. “Revised” was stated to be the best composite, featuring it on the national billboard.
A suspicious man in Carmichael in 1976.
Context: This composite is associated with 10/18/76 (victim #7) in Carmichael. A witness saw a suspicious man in the neighborhood who boarded a bus and told the driver he lived on La Riviera Drive. (Info from Portofleith).
Validity: The composite is of a suspicious man. As with many composites, it is not a direct sighting of EAR.
On this date, a 6-year-old girl woke in the night to use the bathroom. EAR was standing in the doorway of the kitchen. This is what she saw:
He was wearing a purple t-shirt, a brown ski mask, black knit mittens, a belt that held a sword (or hunting knife, possibly) and a gun in a holster. He also wore a watch and no pants.
Under hypnosis, the girl recalled a few more details: a tattoo that resembled the Schlitz Malt Liquor bull on his left forearm; a belt buckle with two revolvers on it, their barrels crossed; and a large black ring on his right hand. A close-up of the ring and the belt buckle:
Context: The girl was unharmed. EAR said he was playing tricks with her mom and dad. She didn’t understand what he was saying, so she went to the bathroom and then back to bed.
With the exception of the sighting by a child, the attack on the parents resembled other EAR attacks.
Validity: By just about any measure, this was an EAR attack. In Crompton’s Sudden Terror and Shelby’s Hunting a Psychopath, the girl was described as “real sharp” and “astute,” which should add some credibility to what the young girl saw. Apparently, only some of the details came from hypnosis, so if some feel skepticism toward that technique, it would apply to only part of the description.
A suspicious man on Shire Lane in Davis on 6/22/78.
Context: Two days before EAR attacked on 6/24/78 on Rivendell Lane, this man was seen on nearby Shire Lane when a woman noticed him in her yard, peering into various windows. (Information from Portofleith).
Validity: As with many other composites, this depicts a suspicious man, not a direct sighting of EAR.
Enhancement by AETV user icyu2:
Nicknames: Shire Lane Man; Fuzzy Hair